Dubai Court of Cassation Shifts the Tide on Legal Fee Recovery in Landmark Ruling

Dubai Court of Cassation Shifts Landscape on Legal Fees: A Turning Point for Contract Enforcement in UAE Courts

In a move that could redefine how legal costs are awarded in the UAE, the Dubai Court of Cassation has overturned a long-standing practice of awarding only symbolic legal fees, even when higher costs were contractually agreed. The judgment, issued on July 23, 2025, in Cassation Appeal No. 503/2025, signals a powerful shift in favour of contract enforcement and full cost recovery for litigants who substantiate their claims.

What Was the Case About?

At the heart of the case was a commercial loan agreement. The lender had sued for repayment of AED 1.14 million, plus contractual interest, penalties, and attorney’s fees. While the trial and appellate courts awarded the principal loan amount, they denied recovery of actual legal fees, citing the common view that such fees, even if agreed between client and lawyer, were not binding on the opposing party.

Instead, the plaintiff was awarded a nominal AED 300 in legal fees, a standard practice in many UAE courts, regardless of how much was actually paid to lawyers.

Cassation Court’s Game-Changing Ruling

The Court of Cassation, however, rejected this interpretation. Citing Article 246 of the UAE Civil Transactions Code, which upholds the sanctity of contracts (“العقد شريعة المتعاقدين”), the Court held that:

• If the contract clearly stipulates that legal fees are recoverable by one party,
• And if the claimant provides valid invoices and proof of payment,
• Then the losing party can be ordered to pay those legal costs in full.

This aligns Dubai more closely with Common Law jurisdictions and international arbitration norms, where courts and tribunals regularly award actual legal costs to the prevailing party.

A Shift in UAE Litigation Culture

Historically, parties winning in UAE civil courts rarely recovered more than AED 1,000 to 2,000 per litigation stage, far below their actual out-of-pocket expenses. This precedent may open the door for:

• Businesses to confidently negotiate legal fee clauses, knowing they can be enforced.
• Law firms to invoice clients without worrying that enforcement will be symbolic.
• Judges to move away from discretionary awards and instead follow clear contractual terms.

• Note: While the Cassation Court has set a new precedent by affirming the enforceability of contractual fee clauses, the matter has been remanded to the Court of Appeal for recalculation. The final ruling on the awarded amount is still pending.

Why This Ruling Matters

This case represents a foundational moment in UAE jurisprudence. For commercial parties, it means that cost recovery is no longer an uphill battle, if your contract is clear and your documentation is strong. This is more than just a win for one lender, it’s a potential precedent-setting shift in how UAE courts approach legal cost recovery.

Key Takeaways:

• Enforceability of Contractual Legal Fees: Parties who clearly stipulate responsibility for legal fees in their agreements can now demand their full recovery in court, not just token amounts.
  
  
• Proof is Power: The Court’s ruling makes clear that substantiated legal invoices and evidence of payment are essential to securing a favorable outcome.
  
  
• Harmonization with International Norms: The decision brings Dubai’s approach closer to Common Law and arbitration systems, where fee-shifting clauses are routinely enforced.

Implications for Contracts and Litigation Strategy

Businesses and individuals litigating in the UAE should now revisit their contract templates, especially those involving loans, services, partnerships, and shareholder agreements. Inclusion of a clear legal cost indemnity clause, and ensuring it aligns with Article 246, is no longer just a precaution. It’s a powerful tool.

At Al Kabban & Associates, we have long advocated for carefully drafted, enforceable contracts that anticipate the full life cycle of a business relationship, including disputes. This ruling validates that approach.

Expert Insight: Al Kabban & Associates

At Al Kabban & Associates, we welcome this development as a long-overdue recognition of contractual autonomy and litigation equity. For years, our clients have faced challenges in recovering full legal costs, even when contracts expressly provided for it.

This ruling will likely serve as a key reference point in future claims involving legal fee clauses, especially for:

• Loan and facility agreements
• Service contracts
• Shareholder or JV agreements
• Commercial agency disputes

As one of Dubai’s most experienced legal teams in contract enforcement and commercial litigation, we recommend that all clients:

• Review existing contracts to ensure fee recovery clauses are present and enforceable.
• Keep proper documentation of legal invoices and proof of payment.
• Seek legal advice early to preserve your right to recover litigation costs.

For more information or to schedule a consultation, contact us at +971 4 453 9090 or visit www.alkabban.com. 

You can also follow us on social media for more updates on everything law related in the UAE: @Alkabban_Law

ALSO READ:

UAE Strengthens Pro-Arbitration Stance with Landmark Ruling on Tribunal Autonomy

Dubai Enacts new Law to Modernize Dispute Resolution